The frontier does not close; it is consumed from within, its striated logic devoured by a machine that refuses the choice between civilization and wilderness, instead producing a third term: the predator as pure flow.
I. The Frontier as a Gridding of Desire
Antonia Bird's Ravenous (1999) opens not with the wilderness, but with a face—Captain John Boyd's (Guy Pearce) visage frozen in terror during the 1847 Battle of Sacramento, a minor engagement in the Mexican-American War that nonetheless serves as the film's originary scene of facialization. The camera lingers on Boyd's paralyzed expression as bodies fall around him, his inability to move or fight marking him as a failure of the military-faciality machine described as the "white wall/black hole system" (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). This is not mere cowardice; it is the first crack in the regime of signs that organizes the soldier's body into a legible, productive unit of the State apparatus. The uniform, the rank insignia, and the very posture of martial discipline constitute the production of docile bodies, rendered useful through hierarchical observation and normalizing judgment (Foucault, 1977). Yet Boyd's face refuses this docility, becoming instead a site of leakage where the State's investment in faciality begins to hemorrhage.
The Mexican-American War itself functions as the Abstract Machine of American expansionism, a war machine captured and redirected by the State to produce new territories, new markets, and new subjects. The racial logic of Manifest Destiny operates through facialization, the process by which the White Man's face becomes the standard against which all other faces are measured and found wanting (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The Mexican enemy, the Indigenous populations to be displaced, and even the landscape itself must be gridded, mapped, and incorporated into the signifying regime of American territorial sovereignty. Boyd's failure at Sacramento is thus a failure to maintain the facial regime that justifies this violence, a momentary collapse of the white wall that reveals the black hole beneath: not absence, but a void that threatens to swallow the entire apparatus of military discipline.
His punishment—exile to Fort Spencer, a remote outpost in the Sierra Nevada—appears as bureaucratic reassignment but functions as expulsion from the faciality machine. The fort occupies what is theorized as a holey space, neither fully striated nor smooth, but rather a space punctured by holes that connect heterogeneous milieus (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The snow-covered mountains resist cartographic capture; the isolation of the garrison creates temporal distortions where military routine becomes absurd ritual. Here, the State's attempt to extend its facial regime encounters its limit, and it is precisely at this limit that the cannibal machine will emerge.
The historical specificity matters: 1847 marks not only the war with Mexico but also the immediate aftermath of the Donner Party disaster, when American settlers trapped in the mountains resorted to cannibalism to survive. This real historical leakage—the breakdown of civilized comportment into flesh-eating—haunts the film as the return of the repressed within Manifest Destiny's narrative. The film diagrams the machinic processes by which territorial expansion produces its own monstrous supplement, the cannibal as the truth of consumption that the State must simultaneously produce and disavow.
II. The Regime of Faciality: Manifest Destiny and the State
Fort Spencer operates as a miniature theater of facialization, each character assigned a recognizable type within the military-social machine: Colonel Hart as the ineffectual bureaucrat, Reich as the pious soldier, and Toffler as the cowardly drunk. These are not psychological portraits but functional positions within a molar segmentarity, the rigid organization of social space into discrete, hierarchical units (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The uniform serves as the primary technology of facialization, literally framing the face within a standardized visual field that communicates rank and function before any individual characteristics can register.
Yet the fort's distance from command centers reveals the fragility of this facial regime. The weekly mail delivery becomes a lifeline not merely for communication but for the maintenance of faciality itself. Without regular contact with the State apparatus, the faces at Fort Spencer begin to drift. This is evident in the garrison's tolerance of Toffler's alcoholism and Reich's religious mania, deviations that would be disciplined in a more thoroughly striated space but here persist as minor deterritorializations within the molar structure.
The arrival of Colquhoun introduces a face that has already passed through a catastrophic deterritorialization. His story of the wagon train trapped in the mountains is delivered with a face that oscillates between traumatized victim and something else, captured in micro-expressions that exceed the signifying regime of horror. When he describes eating human flesh, his face does not register the expected revulsion; instead, there is a flicker of becoming-intense, a passage toward a threshold where the human face begins to dissolve into pure affect (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987).
The film's visual grammar reinforces this analysis through its treatment of landscape. The establishing shots of the Sierra Nevada present not the sublime wilderness of Romantic painting but a white expanse that resists depth perception, a literal white wall that the camera cannot penetrate. This is striated space at its limit, where the State's cartographic project encounters a territory that refuses to be mapped. The mountains are not smooth space—they do not facilitate nomadic movement—but rather holey space, riddled with caves and crevasses that connect the surface to subterranean flows of desire and violence.
Manifest Destiny's racial logic becomes explicit in the film's treatment of Indigenous presence, which appears primarily through absence and appropriation. The fort's Indigenous scout, George, occupies an impossible position within the faciality regime: his face must be legible to the military apparatus while simultaneously marking him as outside the White Man's face that organizes the regime. The film does not resolve this contradiction but rather uses it to expose the violence of facialization itself. When George reveals knowledge of the Wendigo myth, his face momentarily escapes military coding, accessing a different semiotic system that the State cannot incorporate.
The historical context of the Mexican-American War adds another layer to this racial facialization. The war's justification relied on constructing Mexican subjects as racially inferior, their faces read as signs of barbarism that legitimated American territorial seizure. While the film does not depict Mexican characters, their absence structures the logic: the war has already accomplished its facial work. The cannibal machine that emerges at Fort Spencer thus represents the return of the violence that founded American territorial claims, now turned inward against the white faces that perpetrated it.
III. The Wendigo as a Line of Flight (Not Regression)
The revelation of Colquhoun's true identity as Colonel Ives, a military officer who has deliberately chosen cannibalism, marks the film's decisive break with primitivist readings of the monster. This is not a descent into animality but an ascent into a new form of machinic organization. The Wendigo operates according to a specific logic: consuming human flesh grants the cannibal the strength and vitality of the consumed. This is not metaphor but mechanism, a literal incorporation that produces a body capable of superhuman feats—rapid healing, enhanced strength, and resistance to cold.
Theory distinguishes between becoming-animal and other forms of becoming precisely on the grounds of their relationship to molar organization: "Becoming-animal always involves a pack, a band, a population, a peopling, in short, a multiplicity" (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The Wendigo, however, operates through a different logic—not the pack but the serial incorporation of singularities. Each act of cannibalism adds to the machine without creating collective organization; Ives remains radically singular even as he incorporates others. This suggests a becoming-predator, a line of flight that does not seek the molecular or the minoritarian but rather a new form of majoritarian power that has passed through deterritorialization and emerged as a war machine no longer captured by the State.
The cave where Ives has established his base of operations exemplifies holey space in its most radical form. Unlike the smooth space of the nomad or the striated space of the State, holey space communicates with both while remaining irreducible to either (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The cave burrows through the mountain, creating passages that connect the fort above to subterranean chambers where the cannibal machine operates. This is not a return to prehistory but a sophisticated use of geological formations to create a space outside State surveillance, where new forms of desire can be produced.
The ethical question of Indigenous narrative appropriation demands careful attention. The Wendigo originates in Algonquian mythology as a spirit of insatiable hunger that punishes greed. Narratives of survivance frame such myths not as static folklore but as living technologies of resistance (Vizenor, 1999). Ravenous risks appropriating this myth for a white narrative of frontier violence, yet George's knowledge comes too late to prevent the catastrophe, suggesting that the State's exclusion of Indigenous epistemologies from its own operations produces the conditions for its destruction. The Wendigo becomes a resistant assemblage, a myth that survives colonial appropriation by revealing the cannibalistic logic at the heart of Manifest Destiny itself.
Ives articulates this logic explicitly when he proposes that he and Boyd form a partnership: "We're the future, Boyd. We're the next step in human evolution." This is not the language of regression but of acceleration, a claim that the cannibal machine represents a leap beyond the human into a posthuman configuration. The posthuman condition requires a qualitative shift in how we think about the basic unit of common reference for our species and our polity (Braidotti, 2013). Ives proposes precisely such a shift: the basic unit is no longer the individual human subject but the cannibal machine, a body-without-organs that lives for the flow of blood and flesh, incorporating others through literal consumption.
The film refuses to romanticize this becoming. The Wendigo state produces not liberation but a new form of capture, an addiction that drives Ives to elaborate schemes to secure victims. This is deterritorialization without reterritorialization, a line of flight that does not lead to new territories but to an endless repetition of consumption. Warnings exist against such lines of abolition—flights that turn to destruction and the passion for abolition (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). Ives embodies this danger, his becoming-predator revealing itself as a death drive that threatens to consume the entire social field.
IV. The Ritournelle of the Albarn/Nyman Score
The collaboration between Damon Albarn and Michael Nyman produces a score that functions as a ritournelle or refrain, a prism that marks territory while simultaneously opening it to transformation (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The opening credits sequence establishes the sonic territory through a banjo motif that evokes 19th-century American folk music, grounding the film in a recognizable historical soundscape. Yet this motif is immediately subjected to electronic distortion and dissonant layering, the past being played back through a malfunctioning machine.
The banjo itself carries specific historical resonances: an instrument with African origins, appropriated into white American folk traditions, and associated with both frontier settlement and minstrel shows. Its presence in the score thus encodes the racial violence of westward expansion and the appropriation of Black musical forms. By subjecting this instrument to electronic manipulation, the score diagnoses the violence already present in the instrument's cultural history.
The track "Boyd's Journey" exemplifies the ritournelle's territorial function. As Boyd travels to Fort Spencer, the score establishes a repeating ascending figure in the banjo, suggesting forward movement. Yet this figure never resolves; instead, it cycles back on itself, creating a sense of spatial disorientation. The addition of orchestral strings and electronic drones gradually overwhelms the banjo, marking the dissolution of the individual voice into the machinic assemblage.
The most radical sonic deterritorialization occurs when Ives recounts the wagon train disaster. Here, the score abandons melodic development entirely, constructing a rhythmic pattern from percussive sounds—scraping, tapping, breathing—that suggest the mechanical operation of a machine. This is the ritournelle at its most abstract, no longer marking a recognizable territory but producing a new sonic space. The viewer is forced into a becoming-music, a passage where sound invades and transpierces the subject (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987).
The score's use of silence functions as importantly as its use of sound. Long stretches without music during violent sequences create a vacuum that amplifies the visceral sounds of flesh tearing and bones breaking. This is not the absence of the ritournelle but its negative form, marking the territory's boundaries. When the music returns, it does so with renewed intensity, as if the silence had been a gathering of sonic forces that now explode back into the auditory field.
Traditional Western scores use music to reinforce the mythic dimensions of frontier narrative. The Albarn/Nyman score inverts this relationship: rather than supporting the visual narrative, the music undermines it, creating sonic dissonances that prevent the viewer from settling into generic expectations. This is the ritournelle as critical tool, a refrain that marks territory only to reveal the violence required to maintain it.
V. Faciality in Crisis: The Pale and the Holey
The transformation of Boyd's face across the film's runtime provides a visual diagram of faciality's collapse. In the opening sequences, his face remains legible within the military-faciality machine—the camera frames him in medium close-ups that preserve the integrity of the facial form, the white wall of skin and the black holes of eyes maintaining their signifying function. Yet as Boyd is forced to consume human flesh to survive, his face begins to undergo a molecular transformation.
The first visible change is the skin's translucence, a pallor that suggests a fundamental alteration in the body's relationship to its surface. The face is described as a surface of facialization where the white wall of the signifier meets the black hole of subjectivity (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). Boyd's increasingly transparent skin reveals this white wall as a membrane rather than a solid surface, a boundary that can be breached. Close-up shots emphasize the visibility of veins beneath the skin, mapping an interior geography normally hidden from view.
The eyes undergo an even more radical transformation. In the Wendigo state, Boyd's eyes lose their capacity for expression, becoming instead pure black holes—voids that absorb light and meaning without returning anything recognizable. Extreme close-ups isolate the eyes from the rest of the face, presenting them as autonomous organs that no longer participate in the production of faciality. This is the face becoming body-without-organs, a surface without depth where the distinction between interior and exterior collapses.
The film's use of practical effects rather than CGI for these transformations is crucial. The visible materiality of makeup and prosthetics emphasizes the face as flesh, as a physical substance that can be manipulated. When Boyd's wounds heal with supernatural speed, the camera lingers on the process, showing skin knitting together in time-lapse sequences that reveal the body as a self-organizing system no longer governed by human biological limits. This is not the transcendence of the flesh but its intensification, the body becoming more body, more capable of sustaining itself through the incorporation of others.
The final confrontation between Boyd and Ives stages faciality's complete dissolution. Trapped together in a bear trap, their faces pressed close in a grotesque parody of intimacy, both men have passed beyond the regime of signs. The camera refuses to cut away, holding on their faces as they struggle, presenting not a battle between good and evil but a machinic coupling where two bodies-without-organs attempt to incorporate each other. The face here is reduced to its material substrate—skin, bone, muscle—no longer capable of signifying anything beyond its own physical presence.
This dissolution of faciality connects directly to the concept of the body-without-organs, the unformed, unorganized, nonstratified, or destratified body and all its flows (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The cannibal machine produces a BwO by breaking down the organized body into flows that can be redirected and recombined. The face, as the most highly organized and stratified part of the body, must be the first casualty of this process. What remains is a passage into a posthuman state where the body operates according to new principles of organization that the State apparatus cannot recognize or control.
VI. The Predator as a New Territory
The film's conclusion refuses resolution, instead presenting a tableau of mutual destruction that suggests the cannibal machine's ultimate trajectory. Boyd and Ives die together, locked in the bear trap, their blood mingling as their bodies fail. Yet the film's final shot—a slow pan across the fort's empty buildings—suggests that the machine itself survives. This is not the triumph of civilization over barbarism but the revelation that the distinction between the two was always illusory, that the State and the cannibal machine are different configurations of the same fundamental drives toward consumption.
The Wendigo, in this reading, represents the logical conclusion of American expansionism. Manifest Destiny's rhetoric of territorial acquisition operates according to the same logic as cannibalism: the incorporation of the Other into the Self. The difference is only one of scale—the State consumes populations and landscapes through legal and military mechanisms, while the cannibal consumes individuals through direct physical incorporation. Both produce bodies-without-organs, deterritorialized flows of desire that must be constantly fed to maintain their operation.
This analysis has implications for understanding contemporary forms of consumption under neoliberal capitalism. The cannibal machine diagrammed in the context of 19th-century American expansion has not disappeared but has been abstracted and distributed across global networks. The contemporary subject, interpellated as consumer rather than citizen, operates according to a logic of incorporation that mirrors the Wendigo's insatiable hunger—each act of consumption produces only the need for more consumption, an endless cycle within a larger machinic assemblage.
The film's relationship to the horror genre reveals the cannibalistic logic at the heart of American territorial expansion. The Wendigo becomes a figure for the return of the repressed, the violence that founded the nation coming back to consume its perpetrators. Unlike later post-colonial horror, however, Ravenous does not offer the possibility of escape—the cannibal machine is too thoroughly integrated into the social field and the structures of desire that organize American identity.
The film's treatment of Indigenous knowledge through the Wendigo myth remains a problematic element. While the myth functions as a resistant assemblage that exposes the violence of colonial expansion, its use risks reproducing appropriation. George's character occupies an impossible position—inside and outside the military apparatus, his knowledge simultaneously valued and dismissed. This structural contradiction reflects the broader problem of how settler colonial narratives incorporate Indigenous perspectives as sources of knowledge while denying them agency within the narrative.
Yet this very contradiction opens a space for critical reading. The film's failure to resolve the problem of Indigenous representation becomes itself a symptom of the larger failure of the State apparatus to incorporate difference without violence. The Wendigo myth survives precisely because it cannot be fully translated into the terms of the settler colonial narrative—it remains excessive, pointing toward forms of organization that exceed the State's capacity to capture and control.
The final implication of this analysis concerns the nature of responsibility within machinic assemblages. The film distributes guilt across its network of characters—the military hierarchy that exiled Boyd, the garrison that failed to recognize Ives's nature, and Boyd himself. Yet this distribution reveals the machinic character of responsibility: it is not a property of individual subjects but an effect of the assemblage itself. The cannibal machine emerges not from individual moral failure but from the structural violence of American expansionism, a violence that requires the participation of countless actors who work together to produce catastrophic outcomes.
References
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Vizenor, G. (1999). Manifest manners: Narratives on postindian survivance. University of Nebraska Press.
Comments
Post a Comment