The only freedom granted by the striated grid of middle-class compliance is the illusion of escape—a road trip that functions as a final, desperate gesture by the molar subject attempting to retrieve a nomadic essence already poisoned by the demands of the capitalist Axiom.
The Great American Deterritorialization: When Bromance Hits the BwO
The journey begins not as a celebration of freedom but as a funeral procession for desire, a two-man caravan carrying the wreckage of Mitchel’s codified existence and the bitter ressentiment of Carter’s arrested ambition. Mitchel, entombed within the a priori structures of success—the predictable job, the "settled" wife, the tax codes wrapped around self-esteem—is the perfect product of the capitalist Socius, a subject who has successfully interiorized the law that demands normalization. Carter, conversely, is the failed desiring-machine, the gear that refuses to mesh, whose line of flight has stalled and curdled into moralistic judgment and nostalgia for a past that was likely never real.
The moment Carter executes his clumsy, desperate plan to feign a breakdown, he forces a deterritorialization (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987). The car—the primary symbol of mobility within the striated space of the American road network—is rendered inert, violently casting the subjects onto the smooth, unsegmented plane of the desert, the Body without Organs (BwO). This BwO is a surface of absolute intensity, where the social codes (manners, relationships, career success) cannot adhere. Here, language breaks down, and the men must confront the pure, anti-productive chaos of their own mutual attachment, a bond that is both romantic ideal and parasitic necessity.
Carter's rage, his moralized critique of Mitchel’s wife as a dull anchor, is the final, desperate expulsion of Nietzschean ressentiment (Nietzsche, 1968). It is the hatred of the thwarted will, directed not at the machine of stratification itself, but at the successful subject who, in yielding to the machine, exposed Carter’s own failure to sustain his line of flight. Mitchel's reciprocal rage is the sudden, violent unplugging of his own successful desiring-machine; the monthly confession that he is "tired awake by the feeling that he has failed on his dreams and that all that he has achieved is meaningless" confirms that the Symbolic Law has failed to suture the gap in his desire (Lacan, 2007). The successful life is, for Žižek, merely the successful management of ideological fantasy, but Mitchel's waking terror is the moment the Real intrudes, revealing the fantasy as threadbare (Žižek, 1989).
The Molecular Dissolution of the Ego: When Dignity Becomes Disposable
What follows is the molecular dissolution of the male ego under the duress of the BwO. The violence—the breaking of each other’s faces—is not a standard Hollywood confrontation meant to clear the air. It is the necessary shattering of the personal signifier, the destruction of the faces they presented to the Socius. Foucault reminds us that the self is constituted by the power/knowledge apparatuses of society; here, that apparatus has melted under the desert sun (Foucault, 1995).
The cuddling in the foxhole, covering themselves in sand, is the raw, affective re-connection achieved only after the personal subjectivities have been incinerated. This is the formation of a "groupuscule"—a temporary, nomadic assemblage whose only code is immediate survival and the mutual sharing of warmth. The body here is re-coded for simple, primary flows: heat, shelter, proximity. The schizo-flow has stripped away the Oedipal baggage (the wife, the job, the bromance ideal) and replaced it with a pre-Oedipal, libidinal connection, a temporary return to the undifferentiated material of the earth.
"The primary function of the machine is, of course, to reduce the subject to a pure intensity of feeling, or to make it capable of being subjected to the code that operates with this intensity." (Deleuze & Guattari, Anti-Oedipus, 1983, p. 110, slightly modified)
Their ability to inflict violence upon one another, yet still seek comfort, exposes the fragile dignity of modern masculinity. The question "How fragile is the meaning in one's life if it cannot withstand the most basic of criticism?" is answered by the Marxist analysis of alienation (Marx, 1978). The meaning in Mitchel's life is entirely externalized—invested in his alienated labor (the job) and the reproductive apparatus (the wife). Carter’s critique threatens to reveal the alienation as meaningless, forcing Mitchel to defend not his life, but the system of his life, even if the defense requires attempted fratricide. The confrontation is not about friendship; it is about the Symbolic maintenance of the Socius's demand for normalization.
The Simulacrum of the Happy Ending: When the Line of Flight is Recuperated
The ending of Scenic Route presents the ultimate schizoanalytic problem: the successful recuperation of the line of flight. They are rescued, "re-bonded as if they spent the week at a spa rather than beating the shit out of each other." Carter moves into the guest house. Mitchel's wife is revealed to be "not the bore." The two men who almost murdered each other are given an all-too-easy "happy ending," a forced resolution so perfect it immediately triggers suspicion.
This is where the desert's chaotic truth is swallowed by the simulacrum (Baudrillard, 1994). The ambiguous final scene—Mitchel waking violently, calling Carter, expressing worry that they are still dying in the desert—is the internal schizophrenic break that refuses to be stabilized by the imposed reality.
Carter’s retort, "Is it harder to believe that everything worked out for the best rather than for the worst?" is the ideological question posed by the successful recuperation. The system demands that we believe in the "best"—the happy return, the friendship restored, the wife redeemed. But the intensity of the BwO—the raw, traumatic truth of the desert conflict—has left an unhealable rupture. The happy ending is a hyperreality, a model of the real without origin or reality. The restored friendship is a simulacrum of the old bromance, layered over the absolute knowledge that they sought to end each other's existence.
The monthly awakening (Mitchel's dread) and the final waking call (the dream/reality ambiguity) reveal the failure of the recuperation. The desert experience was a becoming-revolutionary, a brief moment when the subjects unplugged from the Socius. But the Axiomatic of Capital is a master of capture, immediately re-territorializing the flow of energy. The new arrangement—Carter in the guest house, Mitchel in his marriage—is merely a slightly adjusted codification, a different channel for the same flow of desire, still failing to satisfy the underlying desiring-machines that demand limitless connection and authenticity.
The tragic truth of Scenic Route is that the line of flight (the revolt against success) failed. The desert did not liberate them; it simply purified their egos, allowing the Oedipal machine to re-insert them back into the flow with greater efficiency, demonstrating that for desire in late capitalism, resistance is always already programmed for capture.
APA References
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation. (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (R. Hurley, M. Seem, & H. R. Lane, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Lacan, J. (2007). Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English. (B. Fink, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Marx, K. (1978). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In R. C. Tucker (Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed., pp. 66–125). W. W. Norton & Company.
Nietzsche, F. (1968). On the Genealogy of Morality. (W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Žižek, S. (1989). The Sublime Object of Ideology. Verso
Comments
Post a Comment